REBOUND IN FERTILITY IN UKRAINE: EXPECTATIONS, FACTORS, OBSTACLES

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to find out whether post-war rebound in fertility will be able to achieve at least the pre-war level in Ukraine and whether the “baby boom” phenomenon will be possible in our country. For the first time, the factors that will contribute to fertility growth or slow down this process were considered in the context of the Russia’s full-scale military invasion of Ukraine. The research was carried out using such methods as analysis and synthesis, comparison, generalization, analogy, graphic method. Fertility accumulates the effect of a huge number of various factors that ultimately manifests itself in certain trend in the development of this process. It is relevant to analyse the factors that will change the birth rate during the war and post-war periods. The long period of military conflict in the east of our country, political tension, decrease in the welfare level of the population, and the protracted nature of the pandemic led to the accumulation of significant number of postponed births. The cohorts born in the 1990s are in active childbearing age now, but they are not large in number. This can reduce rebound in fertility after the end of the war. At the same time, certain expectations of increase in fertility are associated with women aged 30–34, who are more numerous than the younger cohorts, have accumulated significant number of postponed births and further postponement will increase the risk of impossibility to implement childbearing plans due to biological factor. Large number of dead, destroyed housing and infrastructure, social and economic problems, uncertainty about the future, significant share of refugees who decide not to return to Ukraine can significantly restrict rebound in fertility. Responsibility towards the unborn child forms the intention to further postpone their birth, but raising the responsibility of parenthood to the level of family or society will not allow the rejection of plans to give birth to a child. Under the condition of comprehensive family policy, in particular a pronatalist policy, one can hope for increase in the birth rate in the post-war period. However, it is unlikely that the number of births will exceed the number hit during the wave of increased fertility (that is, the possibility of a baby boom).

1. Population of Ukraine. Fertility in Ukraine in the context of social transformation processes. (2008). 288 p. [in Ukrainian].
2. Van Bavel, J., & Reher, D. S. (2013). The Baby Boom and Its Causes: What We Know and What We Need to Know. Population and Development Review, 39, 257-288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2013.00591.x
3. Vandenbroucke, G. (2014). Fertility and Wars: The Case of World War I in France. MPRA (Munich Personal RePEc Archive), 46022. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/46022/. https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.6.2.108
4. Sobotka, T., Jasilioniene, A., Galarza, A., Zeman, K., Nemeth, L., & Jdanov, D. (2021, March). Baby bust in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic? First results from the new STFF data series. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/mvy62
5. Kurylo, I. (2001). About the factors of current birth rate decline in Ukraine. Demographic studies, 23, 7-22. [in Ukrainian].
6. Agadjanian, V., & Prata, N. (2001). War and Reproduction: Angola’s Fertility in Comparative Perspective. Journal of Southern African Studies, 27 (2), 329-347. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2c20219q. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057070120050000
7. Krimer, B. (2015). Effect of Recent Decades Wars on Fertility in Europe. Demography and Social Economy, 1, 126-136. https://doi.org/10.15407/dse2015.01.126 [in Ukrainian].
8. Bolouki, A, & Zal, F. (2020). Impact of War on Fertility and Infertility. Arch. Iran. Med. 23 (4 suppl. 1), 16-22. https://doi.org/10.34172/aim.2020.s4. PMID: 32349503
9. Vedernikova, I. (2022, June). The truth about war. Military analyst Agil Rustamzade: “Russia is being exhausted, and Ukraine is being kept from falling. We will have to fight for a long time.” https://zn.ua/ukr/internal/vijskovij-analitik-ahil-rustamzaderosiju-visnazhujut-a-ukrajini-ne-dajut-upasti-dovedetsja-vojuvati-vdovhu.html [in Ukrainian].
10. Analytical report on conducting a representative sociological study on the situation of youth in Ukraine (2019). https://mms.gov.ua/storage/app/sites/16/Mizhnarodna_dijalnist/ Sociologichni_doslidzhennia/analitichnii-zvit-2019.pdf [in Ukrainian].
11. Sociological study “Youth of Ukraine – 2015” (2015). https://mms.gov.ua/storage/app/ sites/16/Mizhnarodna_dijalnist/Sociologichni_doslidzhennia/molod-ukraine-block.pdf [in Ukrainian].
12. Demographic forecasts (2020). Ptoukha Institute for Demography and Social Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. https://idss.org.ua/forecasts/nation_pop_ proj [in Ukrainian].
13. Aksyonova, S. Y., & Kurylo, I. O. (2018). Postponement of Childbirth in Ukraine through the Prism of Cohort Women. Demography and Social Economy, 3 (34), 11-25. https://doi. org/10.15407/dse2018.03.011 [in Ukrainian].
14. Fourteenth National Survey: Psychological Markers of War (2022, June). Sociological group «Rating». https://ratinggroup.ua/research/ukraine/chetyrnadcatyy_obschenacionalnyy_ opros_ psihologicheskie_markery_voyny_18-19_iyunya_2022.html [in Ukrainian].
15. Stepanenko, V. (2020). Social features of the COVID-19 pandemic in Ukraine. Ukrainian society: monitoring social changes, 7 (21). 547 p. [in Ukrainian].
16. Konstantinova, N. (2021, November). “COVID” and pregnancy: danger, risks and fear of vaccination. https://www.radiosvoboda.org/a/kovid-i-vahitnist-nebezpekaryzyky-strah-vaksynasii/31580461.html [in Ukrainian].
17. Brown, Е.-А. (2021, December). The pandemic delivered a surprise to Nordic countries: a baby boom. National Geographic. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/history/article/ the-pandemic-delivered-a-surprise-to-nordic-countries-a-baby-boom
18. Luppi, F., Arpino, B., & Rosina, A. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on fertility plans in Italy, Germany, France, Spain, and the United Kingdom. Demographic Research, 43, 1399- 1412. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2020.43.47
19. Sobotka, T., Zeman, K., Lesthaeghe, R., & Frejka, T. (2011). Postponement and recuperation in cohort fertility: New analytical and projection methods and their application. European Demographic Research Papers, 2. 86 р.
20. Sobenko, N. (2022, June). During the war in Ukraine, 116,000 residential buildings were destroyed or damaged. Suspilne. Novyny. https://suspilne.media/251131-za-cas-vijni-vukraini-zrujnovano-abo-poskodzeno-116-tisac-zitlovih-budinkiv/ [in Ukrainian].
21. Nobles, J., Frankenberg, E., & Thomas, D. (2015). The Effects of Mortality on Fertility: Population Dynamics After a Natural Disaster. Demography, 52, 15-38. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s13524-014-0362-1
22. About 340 children have already died as a result of the armed aggression of the Russian Federation in Ukraine (2022, June). Slovo i dilo. Analytical portal. https://www.slovoidilo. ua/2022/06/25/novyna/suspilstvo/vnaslidok-zbrojnoyi-ahresiyi-rf-ukrayini-zahynulyvzhe-340-ditej [in Ukrainian].
23. Rodgers, J. L., St. John, C. A., & Coleman, К. (2005). Did fertility go up after the Oklahoma City bombing? An analysis of births in metropolitan counties in Oklahoma, 1990- 1999. Demography, 42 (4), 675-692. http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1353%2Fdem. 2005.0034.pdf#page-1. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2005.0034
24. Finlay, Jocelyn, E. (2009). Fertility Response to Natural Disasters: The Case of Three High Mortality Earthquakes Policy. Research Working Paper 4883. https://www.researchgate. net/publication/46444037_Fertility_response_to_natural_disasters_The_case_of_three_ high_mortality_earthquakes. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-4883