INSTITUTIONAL ENVIRONMENT OF THE LABOR REMUNERATION

Abstract

The problem of adequate performance of economic and social functions of labor remuneration and its compliance with the criteria of decent work is extremely relevant for Ukraine. The problem cannot be solved only by adjusting the existing and adopting new normative legal acts of labor law, since the corresponding legislative amendments must be accepted by the key parties to social and labor relations. The purpose of the article is to investigate the institutional environment in the field of labor remuneration in Ukraine in its various manifestations, to identify the most common institutional constructions, structures and practices that need correction and should become a priority object of state policy. The research was conducted using the methods of desk study. In the absence of official statistical data on the labor market and wages, indirect assessment methods were used based on available administrative data, materials of international organizations, results of sociological surveys, etc. The authors abandoned the traditional identification of institutions exclusively with formal organizations, which are mainly created by the government. The novelty is provided by the study of widespread informal institutional structures and practices, their main manifestations and socio-economic consequences.  he study revealed that due to the low efficiency of controlling and punitive instruments of state regulation, several informal and implicit institutional structures have taken root in the institutional environment of the sphere of labor remuneration in addition to or instead of formal norms and rules, in particular, the shadowing of labor remuneration, labor remuneration based on individual agreements, unpaid overtime work, fictitious individual entrepreneurs, etc. Manifestations, main causes and consequences of the spread of informal practices are analysed. The impact of the full-scale military aggression against Ukraine on the labor market and labor force patterns in terms of working conditions and wages is assessed, and the risk of deepening shortage of workers for the needs of the post-war reconstruction is emphasized. The role of the government as the largest employer and the main transformations of the wage institution in the public sector are revealed. Conclusions have been made regarding the priority functions of the state in the sphere of wages, based on the need to ensure the resilience of the national economy.

REFERENCES 

1. Bassanini, A., & Duval, R. (2006). Employment patterns in OECD countries: Reassessing the role policies and institutions. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 486. https://doi.org/10.1787/846627332717
2. Bassanini, А., Batut, С., & Caroli, Е. (2023). Labor Market Concentration and Wages: Incumbents versus New Hires. Labour Economics, 81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco. 2023.102338
3. Benmelech, Е., Bergman, К., & Kim, H. (2022). Strong Employers and Weak Employees: How Does Employer Concentration Affect Wages? Journal of Human Resources, 57(S), 200—250. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.monopsony.0119-10007R1
4. Eichhorst, W., Kalleberg, A., Portela de Souza, A., & Visser, J. (2019). Designing Good Labour Market Institutions: How to Reconcile Flexibility, Productivity and Security? IZA: Institute of Labor Economics, 12482. https://docs.iza.org/dp12482.pdf https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3427621
5. Gautier, E., Roux, S., & Castillo, M. (2022). How do wage setting institutions affect wage rigidity? Evidence from French micro data. Labour Economics, 78. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.labeco.2022.102232
6. ILO (2020). COVID-19: Public Employment Services and Labour Market Policy Responses. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_emp/documents/publication/ wcms_753404.pdf
7. ILO (2022а). World Employment and Social Outlook: Trends 2022. https://www.ilo.org/ global/research/global-reports/weso/trends2022/WCMS_834081/lang--en/index.htm
8. ILO (2023). Global Employment Policy Review 2023: Macroeconomic policies for recovery and structural transformation. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_emp/ do cuments/publication/wcms_882222.pdf
9. ILO (2022b). Social dialogue report 2022: collective bargaining for an inclusive, sustainable and resilient recovery. https://doi.org/10.54394/VWWK3318
10. European Commission (2020). Special Eurobarometer 498: Undeclared work in the European Union. http://dx.doi.org/10.2767/018492
11. Williams, С., & Round, J. (2010). Explaining participation in undeclared work. European Societies, 12(3), 391—418. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616691003716910
12. Williams, С. (2021). Explaining and tackling undeclared work in south east Europe: lessons from 2019 Eurobarometer survey. UTMS Journal of Economics, 12(1), 1—18. https://econpapers.repec.org/article/risutmsje/0301.htm
13. North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678
14. Helmke, G., & Levitsky, S. (2004). Informal institutions and comparative politics: a research agenda. Perspectives on Politics, 2(4), 725—740. https://www.jstor.org/stable/ 3688540 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592704040472
15. State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2024). Salary and social and labor relations. https:// ukrstat.gov.ua
16. Guardiancich, I., & Artale, W. (2018). Institutional Underpinnings of the Minimum Wage Fixing Machinery: The Role of Social Dialogue. Geneva: ILO. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/ groups/public/---ed_dialogue/---dialogue/documents/publication/wcms_645575.pdf
17. ILO (2021). Collective agreement regulation in Ukraine and Germany. Recommendations for Ukraine. Geneva [in Ukrainian].
18. ILO (2018). Strategic policy for improving the business climate to ensure sustainable business development in Ukraine: a report based on the results of the ILO study. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
19. Kyiv International Institute of Sociology (2023). Why might Ukrainians not want to pay taxes? https://www.kiis.com.ua/?lang=ukr&cat=reports&id=1259&page=1 [in Ukrainian].
20. DOU (2020). Portrait of an IT specialist — 2020. Analytics. https://dou.ua/lenta/articles/ portrait-2020 [in Ukrainian].
21. Listrova, S. (2023). Penalties to employees: a tool to «stimulate» or reduce wages. Chief accountant: labor and salary, 1. https://ezarplata.expertus.com.ua/articleprint?aid=10003805 [in Ukrainian].
22. Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine (2022). Draft Ukraine Recovery Plan. Materials of the working group «Recovery and development of the economy». https://www.kmu.gov.ua/ storage/app/sites/1/recoveryrada/ua/economic-recovery-and-development.pdf [in Ukrainian].
23. Libanova, E. (2023, October 19). How the labor market changed during the war: present and prospects. Mirror of the week. https://zn.ua/ukr/ECONOMICS/jak-zminivsja-rinokpratsi-u-vojennij-chas-sohodennja-ta-perspektivi.html [in Ukrainian].
24. National Bank of Ukraine (2024). Inflation report. January 2024. https://bank.gov.ua/ admin_uploads/article/IR_2024-Q1.pdf?v=7 [in Ukrainian].
25. Lisohor, L., & Sudakov, M. (2023). Labor market of Ukraine 2022—2023: state, trends and prospects. https://solidarityfund.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/ebrd_ukrainelm-1.pdf [in Ukrainian].
26. Monastyrska, G. (2015, December 4). Public sector worker is a bitter word. Mirror of the week. https://zn.ua/ukr/internal/ce-girke-slovo-byudzhetnik-_.html [in Ukrainian].
27. Ukrainian Center for Evaluation of the Quality of Education (2016). The influence of the socio-economic environment on the learning outcomes of students (pupils) of general education institutions. http://testportal.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/zvit_oputyv_ 2016.pdf [in Ukrainian].
28. Khmelevska, O. (2017). Tutoring as a component of shadow education and the possibility of its assessment in Ukraine. Demography and social economy, 1 (29), 37—53. https://doi. org/10.15407/dse2017.01.037 [in Ukrainian].