REFORMING THE PAYMENT OF EMPLOYEES OF THE BUDGET SECTOR IN UKRAINE

Abstract

Socio-economic instability in Ukraine is accompanied by contradictions in payments to employees, which negatively affects work efficiency and motivation. Moreover, the issue of remuneration in the public sector is the most urgent for the country, since the principles of its financing mainly at the expense of the budget, and the imperfection of its formation mechanisms are the reasons for the lack of correlation between the qualifications of employees and the level of remuneration, the increase in poverty among employees, and other negative consequences. The above prioritizes the substantiation of the theoretical and methodological tasks of reforming the system of public employees remuneration. The purpose of the article is to identify deficiencies in the remuneration of public sector employees in Ukraine and to improve the system and mechanisms of employee remuneration in the public sector. The research was carried out using the following methods: analysis and synthesis, comparison, generalization, analogies. An abstract-logical approach was used to formulate the conclusions. It is stated that at present three systems of wages financing exist in the country for employees whose wages are paid with funds from the state budget (on the basis of YeTS [unified pay rate system], on the basis of the provisions of special laws and decrees as well as the combined system existing in the healthcare as a result of its reformation) which may create additional risks as relates to limitations of wage levels and therefore increased shadow employment in the private sector. Negative factors in relation to wages at the government-financed organizations are determined, namely no correlation between wages of most employees in this sphere and their performance and quality of services which they provide, continuous decrease in wages, disproportions in wage levels of employees with the same qualifications which all lead to risks of qualified personnel outflow into other sectors of economy and further limitation of provided services’ quality in the longer run. Risk minimization tools are proposed for the specific risks in the government-financed organizations wages system which are based on optimization of existing network of state budget funds recipients (streamlining and improvement first and foremost of the network of educational and medical institutions financed by the state) and transition toward a semi-autonomous model (which will allow government-financed organizations and institutions to independently attract additional funding and spend it on their own needs which would stimulate further development) as well as awarding to the government-financed organizations and institutions the right to place currently unused funds at commercial banks which would generate an additional revenue. Also the conceptual basis for creating a results-based wages system financed from the state budget is developed which includes tools and principles of its formation and formation of its elements, determines its functions and establishes a favourable motivational environment which will ensure adequate remuneration of government financed organizations’ employees for their work as well as actively stimulate them toward achieving better results of the work and fulfillment of the organizational goals.

REFERENCES

1. Afonso, A., & Gomes, P. (2008). Interactions between private and public sector wages. European Central Bank Working Paper Series, 971. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp971.pdf   https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1302785
2. Gomes, P. (2014). Optimal public sector wages. The Economic Journal, 125 (September), 1425—1451. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12155
3. Singleton, C. (2019). The public-private sector wage differential in the UK: evidence from longitudinal employer-employee data. Economics Letters, 109—113. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.econlet.2018.11.005
4. Petrova, I. L., & Blyzniuk, V. V. (2018). Ukrainian labor market: imperatives and opportunities for change. Kyiv: Institute for Economics and Forecasting, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 356 p. http://ief.org.ua/docs/mg/306.pdf [in Ukrainian].
5. Vasiurenko, L. V. (2018). State regulation of the organization of labor remuneration. 317 p. [in Ukrainian].
6. Kolot, A. M., Daniuk, V. M., & Herasymenko, O. O. (2017). Decent work: imperatives, Ukrainian realities, security mechanisms: monograph. Kyiv: KNEU named after Vadym Hetman, 500 p. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/197264257.pdf [in Ukrainian].
7. Kolot, A. M., & Herasymenko, O. O. (2021). Work XXI: philosophy of change, challenges, vectors of development: monograph. Kyiv: KNEU named after Vadym Hetman, 487 p. https://ir.kneu.edu.ua/bitstream/handle/2010/36870/Pfzvvr_2021.pdf ?sequence= 3&isAllowed=y [in Ukrainian].
8. Libanova, E. M. (2016). The crisis of income policy in Ukraine. Economy of Ukraine, 8(657), 62—77. http://economyukr.org.ua/?page_id=723&lang=uk&aid=295 [in Ukrainian].
9. Lisogor, L. S. (2015). Transformation of the labor market: possibilities of implementing innovative changes in modern conditions. Bulletin of the Precarpathian University, XI, 177—183. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Vpu_Ekon_2015_11_37 [in Ukrainian].
10. Tkachenko, L. (2013). Productivity and wages: the dialectic of interaction. Demography and social economy, 1(19), 132—141. https://dse.org.ua/arhcive/19/13.pdf  https://doi.org/10.15407/dse2013.01.132 [in Ukrainian].
11. Tsymbal, O. I. et. al. (2021). Human development in Ukraine. Priorities of the national policy of minimizing the asymmetry of the Ukrainian labor market. Ptoukha Institute for Demography and Social Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Kyiv: Akademperiodyka, 210 p. [in Ukrainian].
12. Tsymbaliuk, S. (2017). Labor remuneration policy in the publicd sector of Ukraine: main trends, shortcomings, proposals for improvement. Problems of the economy, 3, 277—282. https://ir.kneu.edu.ua/bitstream/handle/2010/36059/polit-opl.pdf?sequence=1&is Allowed=y [in Ukrainian].
13. Economic Code of Ukraine (2023). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/436-15#Text [in Ukrainian].
14. Labor of Ukraine: Statistical Collection (2012—2021). State Statistics Service of Ukraine. https://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/ [in Ukrainian].
15. Diachenko, K. S. (2016). Peculiarities of the functioning of publicly funded institutions in the system of state finances. Economy and Society, 7, 739—748. https://economyandsociety. in.ua/journals/7_ukr/125.pdf [in Ukrainian].
16. ILO Convention № 131 on the establishment of minimum wages with special regard to developing countries. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/993_149#Text [in Ukrainian].
17. European Social Charter of 03.05.1996. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_062# Text [in Ukrainian].
18. Remuneration of public sector workers: international experience (2020). National Agen cy of Ukraine on Civil Service, 33 p. https://nads.gov.ua/storage/app/sites/5/ Mignarodniy %20dosvid/oplata-pratsi.pdf [in Ukrainian].
19. Global wages 2018—2019: what’s behind the gender pay gap (2018). ILO. Geneva. https:// www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/---publ/documents/ publication/wcms_783734.pdf [in Ukrainian].
20. Foreign experience of calculating wages in the main sectors of the economy (some countries of Western and Eastern Europe) (2018). Kyiv: Office for financial and economic analysis in the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 21 p. https://ces.org.ua/the-financial-andeconomic-analysis-office/ [in Ukrainian].
21. Civil servants remuneration reform: Analytical note (2017). Center for Economic Strategy. http://ces.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/public_wages_note_ukr1.pdf [in Ukrainian].