ua ru en

№2 (40) 2020

Demography and social economy, 2020, 2(40):3-20
doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/dse2020.02.003
UDK 314.3(477)
JEL Classification: J13

A.V. Sidorenko,
Senior Advisor.
European Centre for Social Welfare Policy and Research
Berggasse 17, 1090 Vienna, Austria
E-mail: sidorenko.alexandre@gmail.com
ORCID 0000-0001-6063-1005

Language: English
Abstract: This review article attempts to identify the most promising approaches and models for bridging the gap between research and policy on ageing. The overall goal of the presented analysis of the international experience in elaborating evidence informed policy on ageing is to promote such experience in the countries of Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Formulating the policy relevant research priorities is essential for ensuring the evidence basis in developing, implementing and monitoring policy actions on ageing. Methodologically this article is an analytical review of international policy documents and research initiatives on ageing. It examines the global (United Nations and World Health Organisation) and the European Union experience for the sources of potential models for advancing the national policy on ageing. The review focuses on the research components of the major international policy frameworks on ageing such as the Vienna International Plan of Action on Ageing (1982), the Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing (2002), and the conceptual documents on ageing elaborated by the World Health Organisation. The analysis of the research priorities on ageing formulated in the global and European Union policy documents as well as in the European programmes and projects on research and innovations, reveals the universal prevalence of the social, biomedical (health and care) and economic priorities. During the current decade, active ageing has become the principal content of the policy on ageing in various parts of the world. The author contends that bridging the prevailing gaps between research and policy processes requires reciprocal actions by major national stakeholders, most importantly by academia researchers and policy makers. Such reciprocity requires aligning the research projects with major policy endeavors in order to provide evidence basis for policy actions. The main conclusion of the article asserts that evidence informed policy would help to prevent the reckless manipulations of public opinion and the distortion of policy content during the current upsurge of populism and ignorance.
Key words: ageing, research evidence, research priorities, policy, European Union
1. United Nations (2002). ‘Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing’, in Report of the Second World Assembly on Ageing. Madrid. 8–12 April 2002. New York: United Nations, pp. 1-42.
2. Sidorenko, A., & Walker, A. (2017). Policy options for responding to population ageing. In: Jean-Pierre Michel, B. Lynn Beattie, Finbarr C. Martin, and Jeremy D. Walston (eds) Oxford Textbook of Geriatric Medicine (3 ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198701590.003.0013
3. United Nations (1982). Vienna International Plan of Action on Ageing. New York, NY: United Nations.
4. United Nations (n.d.). Regional Implementation Strategies of the MIPAA. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/development/desa/ageing/madrid-plan-of-action-and-itsimplementation/regional-implementation-strategies-of-the-mipaa.html
5. World Health Organization (2017). Global strategy and action plan on ageing and health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
6. World Health Organization (2002). Active Ageing – A Policy Framework. A contribution of the World Health Organization to the Second United Nations World Assembly on Ageing, Madrid, Spain, April 2002. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
7. World Health Organization (2004). Towards Age-Friendly Primary Health Care (Active ageing series). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
8. World Health Organization (2007). Global Age-Friendly Cities: A Guide. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
9. World Health Organization (n.d.). Healthy Ageing and Active Ageing. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/ageing/healthy-ageing/en/
10. United Nations (n.d.). The Sustainable Development Agenda. Retrieved from http://www. un.org/sustainabledevelopment/development-agenda/
11. World Health Organization (n.d.). Decade of Healthy Ageing 2020–2030. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/decade-of-healthy-ageing/full-decadeproposal/decade-proposal-fulldraft-en.pdf?sfvrsn=8ad3385d_6
12. Sidorenko, A. & Zaidi, A. (2018) International policy frameworks on ageing: assessing progress in reference to the Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing. The Journal of Social Policy Studies, vol.16, No. 1, pp. 141-154. https://doi.org/10.17323/727-0634-2018-16-1-141-154
13. World Health Organization (n.d.). Mid-term progress on the Global strategy. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/ageing/commit-action/measuring-progress/en/
14. World Health Organization (2019) Decade of Healthy Ageing. Development of a proposal for a Decade of Healthy Ageing 2020-2030. Report by the Director-General. Retrieved from https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/EB146/B146_23-en.pdf
15. United Nations Programme on Ageing and the International Association of Gerontology and Geriatrics (2007). Research agenda on ageing for the twenty-first century: 2007 update. New York: UN programme on ageing and IAGG.
16. Andrews, G., & Sidorenko, A. (2004). RAA-21 Regional Priorities for Asia, Europe, and Latin America, IAG Newsletter, 17(4): 10-12.
17. Sidorenko, A. (2004). Implementation of the Madrid International Plan of Action on Aging: Research dimension, Geriatrics and Gerontology International, 4(Suppl.s1): S87-S89.
18. National Research Council (2001) Preparing for an Aging World: The Case for CrossNational Research, Panel on a Research Agenda and New Data for an Aging World, Committee on Population and Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press
19. European Union (2019) Ageing Europe. Looking at the lives of older people in the EU. 2019 edition. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union
20. European Commission (n.d.). Human development and ageing. Retrieved from https:// ec.europa.eu/info/research-and-innovation/research-area/health-research-and-innovation/human-development-and-ageing_en
21. European Commission (n.d.) Active ageing. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/social/ main.jsp?langId=en&catId=1062
22. European Commission (n.d.) Social investment. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/ social/main.jsp?catId=1044&langId=en
23. SAPEA, Science Advice for Policy by European Academies. (2019). Transforming the Future of Ageing. Berlin: SAPEA. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.26356/ageing
24. European innovation partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing (n.d.) Repository. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eip/ageing/repository
25. European Commission (n.d.) Research and innovation https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/ research-and-innovation_en
26. European Commission (n.d.) Human development and ageing. Retrieved from https:// ec.europa.eu/info/research-and-innovation/research-area/health-research-andinnovation/human-development-and-ageing_en
27. European Commission (n.d.) Horizon 2020. Health. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/ programmes/horizon2020/en/area/health
28. European Commission (n.d.) Horizon 2020. Health, Demographic Change and Wellbeing. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/ health-demographic-change-and-wellbeing
29. FUTURAGE (2011) A Road Map for European Ageing Research. Retrieved from http:// www.foragenetwork.eu/database/item/165-2011-futurage-a-roadmap-for-europeanageing-research/
30. MoPAct (n.d.) About the project. Retrieved from http://mopact.group.shef.ac.uk/about/ key-projects/
31. COST (n.d.) About COST. Retrieved from https://www.cost.eu/who-we-are/about-cost/
32. COST (n.d.) What are COST Actions? Retrieved from https://www.cost.eu/cost-actions/ what-are-cost-actions/
33. European Commission (n.d.) Final Report Summary - SIFORAGE Retrieved from https:// cordis.europa.eu/project/id/321482/reporting
34. JPI More Years Better Lives (n.d.) Retrieved from https://www.jp-demographic.eu/
35. Commission of the European Communities (2008) Towards joint programming in research: Working together to tackle common challenges more effectively. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/research/press/2008/pdf/com_2008_468_en.pdf
36. JPI More Years Better Lives (n.d.) Strategic Research Agenda – SRA. Retrieved from https://www.jp-demographic.eu/about-us/strategic-research-agenda-sra/
37. European Commission (n.d.) Support for policy making. Retrieved from https://ec. europa.eu/info/research-and-innovation/strategy/support-policy-making_en
38. European Commission (n.d.) Responsible research & innovation https://ec.europa.eu/ programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/responsible-research-innovation
39. European Commission (n.d.) Coronavirus research and innovation. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/research-and-innovation/research-area/health-research-andinnovation/coronavirus-research-and-innovation_en
40. Parkhurst, J. (2017). The politics of evidence: from evidence-based policy to the good governance of evidence. Routledge Studies in Governance and Public Policy. Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon, UK.
41. Nutley, S., Davies, H. & Walter, I. (2003). Evidence-based policy and practice: cross-sector lessons from the United Kingdom, Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, Issue 20: 29-48
42. Golubev, A.G. & Sidorenko A.V. (2020). Theory and practice of aging upon COVID-19 pandemic, Adv. geront. 33(2): 397-408.

» pdf