-

ua ru en


№3 (37) 2019

Demography and social economy, 2019, 3(37): 133-148
doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/dse2019.03.133
UDC 332.1
JEL СLASSIFICATION: O 15

Т.М. Kalahsnikova
PhD (Economics), Leading Researcher
Ptoukha Institute for Demography and Social Studies
of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
01032, Ukraine, Kyiv, Вlvd, Taras Shevchenkо, 60
E-mail: tatank@meta.ua
ORCID 0000-0002-7963-3155

THE SUBSTANCE OF THE SPATIAL ASPECT OF HUMAN DEVELOPMENT PROCESSES
Section: TERRITORIAL PROCESSESS
Language: Ukrainian
Abstract: The human development is a complex characteristic of the quality of personal development in a particular state and a particular society, localized in a particular place. Thus, the development of a society has a clearly defined spatial dominant. There is also the dialectic connection when the environment forms the personality, and the personality is the driving force for the development of the environment in which he or she lives. The involvement of spatial aspects into the study of the human development processes can provide a deeper understanding of the essence of these processes from the point of view of the modern economy. That is why the purpose of the article is to study the content of the spatial aspect of the human development processes. The studies of human development in a spatial aspect focuses attention on such spatially localized processes and objects: 1) territory as a geographical basis ( the possibilities, limitations and features that a certain geographical localization carries in space); 2) the state of the environment; 3) the state of the artificial environment (the settlement system and the infrastructure facilities, which are industrial, engineering, transport, social facilities); 4) an economic activity and the state of the social environment, as well as the conditions of everyday life of the population. At the same time, the spatial development of society is considered from two main positions: first, it is considered as a process of progress in the development of a single territory and secondly it is considered as the spatial diffusion of progress (socio-economic growth) from one territory to another. The author discloses the substance, the objects, the subjects, the results of the human development process in a spatial context, the specificity of the relationship and the nature of the deployment of the corresponding process in space and time. In particular, the essence of the definition of human development space was proposed for the first time and disclosed as a definite spatial model of human development, which is represented as a living space where population reproduction and development takes place. In this regard, the density, length, structure and coherence of the human development space should be mentioned among the main spatial characteristics of the human development, which acts as an arena for the action of multidirectional forces and, spatially determine its development basing on the specificity of the corresponding territory.
Key words: human development, economic space, social space, space of human development.
References:
1. Capello, R., Camagni, R., Chizzolini, B., & Fratesi, U. (2008). Space and theoretical approaches to regional growth. Modelling Regional Scenarios for the Enlarged Europe: European Competitiveness and Global Strategies. Berlin: Springer, 13-31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74737-6_2
2. Capello, R., Caragliu, A., & Nijkamp, P. (2011). Territorial capital and regional growth: increasing returns in knowledge use. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Vol. 102, 4, 385-405. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2010.00613.x
3. Capello, R., & Fratesi, U. (2013). Growth Patterns in Global Regions: Do Specific Success Factors Make a Difference? Journal of heterodox economics, Vol. 1, 1, 54-78. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/jheec-2015-0003
4. Perroux, F. (1967). Note sur la ville considérée comme pôle de développement et comme foyer du progrès [Note on the city considered as a pole of development and as a center of progress]. Revue Tiers-Monde - Third World Review, Vol. 8, 32, 1147-1158. [in French]. doi: https://doi.org/10.3406/tiers.1967.2413
5. Perroux, F. (1968). Les investissements multinationaux et l’analyse des pôles de développement et des pôles d’intégration [Multinational investments and the analysis of development poles and integration poles]. Revue Tiers-Monde - Third World Review, Vol. 9, 34, 239-265. [in French]. doi: https://doi.org/10.3406/tiers.1968.2436
6. Perroux, F. (1983). A new concept of development: Basic tenets. London: Canberra.
7. Porter, M. (1990). The Competiteve Advantage of Nations. New York: The Free Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11336-1
8. Friedmann, J. (1966). Regional Development Policy: a Case Study of Venezuela. Cambridge (Mass.).
9. Hagerstrand, T. (1966). Aspects of the Spatial Structure of Social Communication and the Diffusion of Information. Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association, 16, 27-42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01888934
10. Yaskal, I.V. (2016) Katehorii “ekonomichnyi prostir” i “prostorova ekonomika” v rehionalnykh doslidzhenniakh [Categories “economic space” and “spatial economy” in regional studies]. Problemy ta perspektyvy rozvytku pidpryiemnytstva - Problems and prospects of entrepreneurship development, 2, 48-54 [in Ukrainian].
11. Dzhaman, M.O. (2019). Vplyv ekonomichnoho prostoru na terytorialnu orhanizatsiiu suspilstva (teoretyko-metodolohichnyi aspekt) [Inflating economic space on the territorial organ of the organization (theoretical methodological aspect)]. Nova stratehiia rehionalnoho rozvytku Ukrainy: shliakh do maibutnoho. Materialy KhII Plenumu Pravlinnia Spilky ekonomistiv Ukrainy - New strategy of regional development of Ukraine: way to Maybutny. Materials ХІІ Plenum of the Rules of the Forum of Economics of Ukraine. [in Ukrainian].
12. Podgrushnyi, G.P. (2017). Formuvannia systemy poliusiv zrostannia v Ukraini yak peredumova yii perekhodu do modeli politsentrychnoho prostorovoho rozvytku [Formation of the system of growth poles in Ukraine as a precondition for its transition to a polycentric spatial development model]. Ukrayins’kyy heohrafichnyy zhurnal - Ukrainian geographical journal, 1, 48-54. [in Ukrainian]. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/ugz2017.01.048
13. Podgrushnyi, G.P. (2015). Postindustrial transformations in the economy of cities of Ukrainian. Function of cities and their influence on space: monograph. Kyiv: Pheniks, 102 – 118. [in Ukrainian].
14. Kalashnіkova, T.M. (2015). Nadbannya frantsuzkoї shkoli prostorovoї ekonomіki v kontekstі lyudskogo rozvitku. Globalnі ta natsіonalnі problemi ekonomіki, 4, 3-9. Retrieved from http://global-national. in.ua/archive/4-2015/02.pdf. [in Ukrainian].
15. Vakulenko, M.O. (2008). Tlumachnyi slovnyk iz fizyky [Dictionary of physics]. Kyiv: Vydavn.-polihraf. tsentr Kyivskyi universytet [in Ukrainian].
16. Suvorova, A.V. (2014). Prostranstvennaja organizacija jekonomicheskoj dejatel’nosti s uchetom urovnja kreativnosti sredy v regione [Institut jekonomiki Ural’skogo otdelenija Rossijskoj akademii nauk]. Extendet abstract of Сandidate’s thesis. Ekaterinburg. Retrieved from http://www.uiec.ru/coutent/files/ Suvorovaiavtoreferat.pdf [in Russian].
17. Minakir, P.A. (2016). Nacional’naja strategija prostranstvennogo razvitija: dobrosovestnye zabluzhdenija ili namerennye uproshhenija? [National Spatial Development Strategy: Conscientious Misconceptions or Deliberate Simplifications?]. Prostranstvennaja jekonomika - Spatial Economics, 3, 7-15 [in Russian]. doi: https://doi.org/10.14530/se.2016.3.007-015
18. Matveev, M.M. (2011). Teoreticheskie osnovy koncepcii sociojekonomicheskogo prostranstva [Theoretical foundations of the concept of socio-economic space] Voprosy innovacionnoj jekonomiki -Issues of innovative economy, 6. Retrieved from http://inec.enjournal.net/article/1050 [in Russian].
19. Novіkova, O.F. (2009). Sotsioekonomika: potreba stanovlennia y rozvytok v Ukraini [Socioeconomics: the need for formation and development in Ukraine]. Socioeconomics. O.І. Amosha (Ed.). NAN Ukrainy. In-t ekonomiky prom-sti. Donetsk [in Ukrainian].
20. Jetcioni, A. (2002). Sociojekonomika: dal’nejshie shagi [Socioeconomics: Next Steps]. (M.S. Dobrjakovoj, Trans); V.V. Radaeva (Ed.). Jekonomicheskaja sociologija - Economic sociology, Vol. 3, 1, 65-71 [in Russian]. doi: https://doi.org/10.17323/1726-3247-2002-1-65-71
21. Burd’e, P. (2005) Social’noe prostranstvo: polja i praktiki [Social space: fields and practices] (N. Shmatko, Trans). Moscow: Institut jeksperimental’noj sociologii; SPb.: Aletejja [in Russian].
22. Burd’e, P. (2007). Sociologija social’nogo prostranstva [Sociology of social space]. (N. Shmatko, Trans). Moscow: Institut jeksperimental’noj sociologii; SPb.: Aletejja [in Russian].
23. Granberg, A.G. (2003). Osnovy regional’noj jekonomiki [Basics of the regional economy]. Moscow: GU VSHE [in Russian].
24. Gataullin, R.T., Karіmov, A.G., & Komarov, A.G. (2014). Ekonomicheskoye prostranstvo: soderzhanie, edinstvo i razryvy [Economic space: content, unity and breaks]. Problemy sovremennoj jekonomiki - Problems of the modern economy, 4, 196-200 [in Russian].
25. Minakir, P.A. (2014). Jekonomicheskij analiz i izmerenija v prostranstve [Economic analysis and measurement in space]. Prostranstvennaja jekonomika - Spatial Economics, 1, 12-39 [in Russian]. doi: https://doi.org/10.14530/se.2014.1.012-039
26. Mirohina, A.A., & Kutovoj, S.I. (2012). Konceptual’nye osnovy depoljarizovannogo razvitija regiona na baze sovershenstvovanija ego prostranstvenno-jekonomicheskoj struktury [Conceptual foundations of a depolarized development of a region based on the improvement of its spatial and economic structure]. Upravlenie, jekonomicheskimi sistemami (jelektronnyj nauchnyj zhurnal) -Management, economic systems (electronic scientific journal), 9. Retrieved from http://www.uecs.ru/regionalimya-ekonomika/itcm/ 1525-20 i 2-09-05-05-47-17-20 R -№9 (45) [in Russian].
27. Berezhnaja, E.V., & Mirohina, A.A. (2012) Prostranstvennoe razvitie regiona: ocenka problemy, perspektivy [Spatial development of the region: assessment of the problem, prospects]. Moscow: Buki Vedi [in Russian].
28. Vasylenko, V.N., Hudz, P.V., & Kratt, O.A. (2009). Dyahnostyka razvytyia rehyonov: struktura, hranytsы, metodы: monohrafyia [Diagnostics of regional development: structure, boundaries, methods: monograph]. Donetsk: Yuho-Vostok [in Russian].
29. Suspicyn, S.A. (2004). Potencii i ogranichenija prostranstvennyh transformacij v jekonomike Rossii [Potentials and limitations of spatial transformations in the Russian economy]. Region: jekonomika i sociologija - Region: economics and sociology, 4, 3-28 [in Russian].
30. Rumjancev, A.A. (2013). Osnovnye svojstva i problemnye polja nauchno-innovacionnogo prostranstva regiona [The main properties and problem fields of the region’s science and innovation space]. Prostranstvennaja jekonomika - Spatial Economics, 2, 103-118 [in Russian]. doi: https://doi.org/10.14530/se.2013.2.103-118
31. Doklad o mirovom razvitii 2009: novyj vzgljad na jekonomicheskuju geografiju [World Development Report 2009: A New Look at Economic Geography] (2009). Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Ves’ mir [in Russian].

» pdf