ua ru en

2 (32) 2018

Demography and social economy, 2018, 2(33):94-102
doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/dse2018.02.094
UDC 314.04

PhD (Economics) Researcher
Demography and Sociology Institute
Ilia State University
0162, Georgia, Tbilisi, Cholokashvili str., 3/5
E-mail: mziashe@yahoo.com

Language: English
Abstract: The presented paper is based on the sociological research conducted by the Institute of Demography and Sociology in recent years that considered studying the regularities and specifics of socio-demographic modernization of a family. The research has found that in the post-Soviet Georgia, prolonging the learning process, along with the economic factor, has had a major impact on the students` reproductive behavior. It has been confirmed that the in publics youngest, intellectual section, the traditional attitude towards the family and marriage relationships is deeply rooted. A sharply negative attitude was identified with respect to giving birth to an extramarital child. The young people believe that a family shall only be created based on love, not on mercenariness. It was found that for them, the process of study, career promotion and marriage are the factors which are incompatible. Therefore, a small share of students were observed to have a wish to get married within the next 5 years. For most of all, the reluctance to take a decision to get married it associated, most of all, with the difficulty to choose a partner. This has been conditioned both by the intention to become economically independent as well as by the psychological immaturity for creating a family. It was identified that this is also an outcome of the gaps existing in the family upbringing and educational system. In particular, along with training the youth in different regular subjects, they are not trained for family relationships. This shall be taken into account for determining family policy measures and developing educational programs. Mass media are able to make great contribution to that process. Unlike their parents generation, students intend to have more children that will not worsen the countrys demographic situation. While determining a future childs gender, no gender-specific bias has been observed so far. It was also identified that the parents` influence on marriage and on determining the number of children to be born has been dramatically reduced; however, the feeling of obligation towards the senior generation has not gone. Also, it was found that in the light of intense globalization, despite vaster opportunities to leave ones own country, the intense interaction with different cultures has, presumably, further highlighted the feeling of ethnic identity.
Key words: Georgia, student, reproductive behavior, marriage, family.
1. Weiss, Robert S. (1994). Learning from Strangers. The Art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies. New York: Free Press.
2. Tukhashvili, M. (1995). Population Education Potential in Georgia. Tbilisi [in Georgian].
3. Surmach, m. Yu. (2008). Reproduktivnie ustanovski maladyozhi belarusiy. Sociologia. 2008. 1. P. 145-151 [in Russian].
4. Tsuladze, G. (2016). Demographic Yearbook of Georgia 2015. Tbilisi. URL: https://iliauni.edu. ge/ uploads /other/39/39659.pdf
5. Menabdishvili, N. (2004). Demographic orientations of students (on the example of Tbilisi), Synopsys, Tbilisi (in Georgian).
6. Sulaberidze A. (2016). Economic Transformation of the Family at the Transitional Stage in Georgia. Problems of Demography and Sociology. Collection of works. Tbilisi. p. 102-107 ]in Georgian].
7. Totadze, A. (2014). What do the youth think (sociological demographic survey). Universali, Tbilisi [in Georgian].
8. Materials of the General Census of Georgian Population.1989, 2002, 2014. URL: www.geostat.ge
9. Menabdishvili, N., Gvritishvili, Ts. (2004). The system of cultural continuum in the system of interests of Georgian students. The Demographic and Sociological Problems of the Academy of Science of Georgia: collection of works, p. 85-90 [in Georgian].
10. National survey of the youth in Georgia. (2014). Analysis of the young peoples status and needs. UNICEF, UNFPA [in Georgian].
11. Tsartsidze M., Kvirkvelia K. (2017). Labor market Oriented Professional Education System the Significant Factor for Human Capital Development and the Inclusive Economic Growth in Georgia. Journal of International Economic Research. Vol. 3, No. 1. p. 21-28. URL: http://irissymposium. wixsite.com/economics/ proceedings
12. Tsartsidze, M., Latsabidze, N. (2017). Labor Market and Professional Education System in Georgia. Journal Migration N8. Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University. Central European University. Tbilisi 2017. P. 96-113 [in Georgian].
13. Tukhashvili, M. (1998). Labor Potential of Georgia: Formation and Distribution. TSU, Tbilisi [in Georgian].
14. Shelia, M. (2008). Attitude Towards Demographic Behavior in the Period of Economic Crisis in Demographically Aged Georgia. Social-Economic Problems in Transition Countries. (collection of Scientific Works,Research Papers and Articles).Universal, Tbilisi.
15. Generation in transitional period: research of the youth 2016. (2017). Georgia, Tbilisi [in Georgian].
16. Shelia, M. (2015). Students attitude towards the conflict in the family. j. Humanities and Social Sciences Review, 4 (2). URL: http://www.universitypublications.net /hssr/ 0402/index.html
17. Shushtakashvili, V. Tsiklauri, Sh. (2014). Birth and reproductive behavior in Georgias urban areas. The problems of demography and sociology. Collection of works, Tbilisi, p. 63-74 [in Georgian].
18. Tsiklauri, Sh. (2014). Selective abortions in Georgia myth or reality?! The problems of demography and sociology. Collection of works, Tbilisi. p. 55-62 [in Georgian].
19. Guilmoto Christophe Z., Tafuro S. (2017). Trends in the Sex Ratio at Birth in Georgia An Overview Based on the 2014 General Population Census Dat. URL: http://georgia.unfpa.org/sites/ default/files/ pub-pdf/4.%20SRB%20Trends_ENGL_Final_0.pdf
20. Kalachikova, O.N. Shabunova., .. (2015). Reproduktivnoe pvedenie kak factor vaspraizvodstva naselenya: tendenciy I perspektivi. Vologda: ISERT RAN [in Russian].
21. Klapova E.A. Reproduktivnoe povedenie maladyzhi kak factor depopulacii. URL: http://www.tsutmb.ru/ nayk/int_konf/vyishel_ocherednoj_nomer_derzhavinskogo_vestnika/i_vserossijskaya_nauchnaya_s tudencheskay/reproduktivnoe_povedenie_molodezhi_kak_faktor_depopulyaczii [in Russian].
22. PavlovaV.E., Shevaldina E.I. (2017). Studenchestkvo kak socialnaya grupa i socialno-cennostnie orientacii. Innovacionnaya nauka. 2017. 4. p.193-196 [in Russian].
23. Reproduktivnoe povedenie molodyozhi. URL: http://un.by/pdf/3_3_7.pdf [in Russian].
24. Savina, A.S. (2015). Otnoshenie studentov g. Moskvi k fenomenu prestizhnogo pjtreblenia. URL: http://www.studfiles.ru/preview/6336044/#2 [in Russian].

» pdf