Demography and social economy, 2017, 3(31):89-99
doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/dse2017.03.089
UDC 316:336
JEL CLASSIFICATION: G110

M.I. Karlin
Dr. Sc.(Economics), Prof.
Lesya Ukrainka Eastern European National University
43025, Ukraine, Lutsk, Volya Avenue, 13
E-mail: Karlin.Mukola@gmail.com

FORMS OF FINANCIAL STIMULATION OF ECOLOGIC RESPONSIBILITY OF BUSINESS, TERRITORIAL COMMUNITIES AND CITIZENS
Section: HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT
Language: Ukrainian
Abstract: The content of new forms of financial incentives for raising the level of socioeconomic responsibility of business, territorial communities and citizens that contribute to the establishment of a «green» economy in the world and in Ukraine is considered. The influence of socially responsible business on the limitation of greenhouse gas emissions and on the development of renewable energy sources is revealed. The social role of territorial communities and households in developing a «green» economy in developed countries and the necessity of using this experience in Ukraine are revealed. The socioeconomic problems of financing of measures for the establishment of the «green» economy in Ukraine at the level of individual enterprises, territorial communities and households are analyzed. Ways to solve them through the use of «green» finance and their components, such as climate finance, climatic positive and negative incentives, carbon tax, carbon stock exchanges, green bonds, green tariffs, revolving loans, etc, are proposed. Socio-economic preconditions for obtaining financial aid from the Green Climate Fund, other international financial organizations by separate Ukrainian enterprises, territorial communities and households under current conditions are researched. While using international financial assistance to solve climatic problems, it must be taken into account that a significant part of this assistance to poor countries may not be used effectively. Therefore, in our country, as well as in other developing countries, it is necessary to involve the public and the business as much as possible in order to control the use of «green» finance. To increase the level of socio-economic responsibility of business, territorial communities and individuals for the state of the environment, it is important for the state and local governments to stimulate financially the development of energy co-operatives in Ukraine, thousands of which work in different countries of the European Union.
Key words: socio-economic responsibility, ecology-economic Pigou paradox, green economy, green finance, carbon tax, «revolving» credit, «green» tariff.
References:
1. Zapatrina, I.V. (2012). Perspektyvy ispolzovania mehanizmov publichno-chastnogo partnerstva dlia razvitiia infrastruktury v Ukraine. [Prospects of using public-private partnership mechanisms for infrastructure development in Ukraine]. Demografia ta socialna ekonomika - Demography and Social Economy, 1, 94-102. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/dse2012.01.094 [in Russian].
2. Nikolaev, E.B. (Eds.). (2016). Socialna ekonomika [Social economy]. Kyiv. KNEU [in Ukrainian].
3. Stiglic, D. (2003). Globalizaciia ta ii tiagar [Globalization and its burden]. Kyiv. KM Akademia [in Ukrainian].
4. Piketti, T. (2016). Kapital v XXI stolitti [Capital in the XXI-st century]. Kyiv. Nach format [in Ukrainian].
5. Crafts, N. (2000). Globalization and Growth in the Twenties Century. IMF.
6. Adshemoglu, D., & Robinson, D. (2016). Chomu nacii zanepadaiut [Why nations fail]. Kyiv. Nach format. [in Ukrainian].
7. Rubcov, B.B., Guseva I.A., & Iliinskii, A.I. et al. (2016). «Zelenye financy» v mire i Rossii. [«Green finance » in the world and in Russia]. Moscow. RUSAJNS [in Russian].
8. Porfirev, B.N. (2016). «Zelenye» tendencii v mirovoj finansovoj sisteme [«Green» trends in the world financial system]. Mirovaia ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnoshenia - World Economy and International Relations, 9, 5-16. [in Russian].
9. Tulaj, O.I. (2017). Derzhavni finansy u zabezpechenni stalogo liudskogo rozvytku. [Public finances in ensuring the sustainable human development]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Ternopil. [in Ukrainian].
10. Gychka, O., & Suzhenko O. (n.d.). Make the world great again: navizho US vychodiat z Paryzkoi ugody.eurointegration.com.ua. Retrieved from http//www.eurointegration.com.ua/articles/2017/06/02/7066-632/
11. Savchuk, S. (2017). Kotelni ciogodni – ce moveton [Boiler houses today are a mauvais ton]. Ukrainckyj tyzhden - Ukrainian week, 7, 18-21. [in Ukrainian].
12. Vlasiuk, O.S. (2016). Socialno-ekonomichnyj rozvytok regionov Ukrainy v umovah decentralizacii vlady: vyklyky, zagrozy, novi mechanizmy [Socio-economic development of Ukraine’s regions in terms of power decentrtalization challenges, threats, vew mechanisms]. Regionalna ekonomika - Regional economy, 3, 5-9. [in Ukrainian].
13. Novikov, V.M. (2016). Instytucionalni mechanizmy realizacii socialnogo potencialu dectntralizacii [Institutional mechanisms for realization of social potential of decentralization]. Demografia ta socialna ekonomika - Demography and Social Economy, 3, 70-82. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/dse2016.03.070 [in Ukrainian].
14. Naukovi dyskusiyi [The scientific discussions]. (2016). Regionalna ekonomika - Regional economy, 3, 142-162. [in Ukrainian].
15. Libanova, E.M. (2012). Socialni problemy modernizacii ukrainskoi ekonomiky [Social problems of modernization of the Ukraine`s economy]. Demografia ta socialna ekonomika - Demography and Social Economy, 1, 5-22. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/dse2012.01.005 [in Ukrainian].

» pdf