" "

ua ru en

2 (18) 2012

Demography and social economy, 2012, 2(18):103-114
doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/dse2012.02.103

PH.D., rofessor, PhD, Director of the Institute of UkrainianPolish cooperation
Chair of Microeconomics, University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszw, Vice Director of the Institute of Financial Research and Analyses in Rzeszw, Poland

Section: Social policy.
Language: English
Abstract: This article diagnoses the use of instruments supporting entrepreneurship by the Podkarpackie Province communes. The main research problem was formulated as follows: Do the instruments of supporting entrepreneurship used by self-government affect the development of economic initiatives in the area of the surveyed communes? We analyzed it in two areas. The first one focuses on the present state, analyzing the quality and directions of actions taken by commune authorities in supporting economic initiatives as well as their results. The second one attempts at pointing the solutions conducive to enterprise development and instruments ensuring their stimulation. The main problem is accompanied by a number of detailed questions about the most frequent and effective support forms, the reasons behind their choice, the assumptions of constructed development strategies and investments made to improve the conditions of conducting business activities.
Key words: regional policy, entrepreneurship, working places , Podkarpackie Province, self-government administration, communes, economic initiatives.

1. Bartik T. J., (1985), "Business Location Decisions in the United States: Estimates of the Effects of Unionization, Taxes and Other Characteristics of States," Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 3 (January): 14–22.

2. Bartik T. J., (1988), "The Effects of Environmental Regulation on Business Location in the United States," Growth and Change (Summer): 22–44.

3. Bondonio D., (2003), "Do Tax Incentives Affect Local Economic Growth? What Mean Impacts Miss in the Analysis of Enterprise Zone Policies," Center for Economic Studies, Working Papers with number 03–17.

4. Brown S., Hayes K. J., Taylor L.L., (2002), "State and local policy, factor markets and regional growth," Working Papers 02 02, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.

5. Buss T. F., 2001. The Effect of State Tax Incentives on Economic Growth and Firm Location Decisions: An overview of the Literature. Economic Development Quarterly 15 (1): 90–105.

6. Carlino G., Mills E. S., (1985), "Do Public Policies Affect County Growth?" Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Business Review, July-August: 3–27.

7. Carlton D., (1983), "The Location and Employment Choices of New Firms: An Econometric Model with Discrete And Continuous Endogenous Variables," Review of Economics and Statistics, 65 (August): 440–449.

8. DePaulo P., Sample size for qualitative research. The risk of missing something important, Quirk's Marketing Research Review, December 2000.

9. Grodzka D., Instrumenty wspierania dzialalnosci przedsiebiorstw przez jednostki samorzadu terytorialnego, [in:] G. Golebiowski (editor), Wybrane problemy wspierania przedsiebiorstw w Polsce, Biuro Analiz Sejmowych, Warszawa 2008.

10. Holmes T. J., (1998), "The Effect of State Policies on the Location of Manufacturing: Evidence from State Borders," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 106(4).

11. Mynarski S., Analiza danych rynkowych i marketingowych z wykorzystaniem programu Statistica, Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej w Krakowie, Krakyw 2003.

12. Papke L. E., (1991), "Interstate Business Tax Differentials and New Firm Location: Evidence From Panel Data," Journal of Public Economics 45(1): 47–68.

13. Sadowska T., Rola samorzadyw w stymulowaniu rozwoju przedsiebiorczosci lokalnej, Folia Universitatis Agriculture Stetinensis 232. Oeconomica 42. Akademia Rolnicza, Szczecin 2003.

14. Slominska B., Gmina w procesach stymulowania przedsiebiorczosci "Samorzad Terytorialny", No 3, 2007.

15. Szewczuk A., Czy polski system wspiera rozwyj lokalny? – [in:] A. Pomorska (editor), Kierunki reformy polskiego systemu podatkowego, UMCS, Lublin 2003.

16. T. Bauman, O mozliwosciach zastosowania metod jakosciowych w badaniach pedagogicznych, [in:] T. Pilch (editor), Zasady badan pedagogicznych, Wydawnictwo Akademickie "Zak", Warszawa 1998.

» pdf