j-dse@ukr.net

" "
-


1 (13) 2010

Demography and social economy, 2010, 1(13):149-157
doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/dse2010.01.149

KRIMER B.O.
The Point to Discuss the Factors of the Human Generative Activity
Section: Researches of junior scholars
Language: Ukrainian
Abstract: The determinants of fertility in modern environment are analyzed in this paper. The different theories of fertility are characterized. The most influential following determinants of fertility are considered: family income end economic environment, womens employment, womens education, family policy, religiosity, marital status. The levels of influence of social-economic determinants are estimated. Family income and employment are most important determinants, but their impact is not absolute. The impact of major determinants of fertility over the past decade were changed. On this basis a friendliness of social environment for childbearing was estimated. The place of Ukraine among European countries in friendliness of social environment for childbearing are allocated. This place is one of the last in Europe.
Key words: determinants of fertility, family income, womens employment, womens education, family policy, religiosity, marital status, friendliness of environment.
References:
1. . B. // . 2007. 6.
2. .., .. - : . // SPERO. 5, 2006. . 7097.
3. Azmat G., Gonzalez L. Targeting Fertility and Female Participation Through the Income Tax http://www.econ.upf.edu/~gonzalez/Research_archivos/LE_2009.pdf
4. Becker G., Lewis H. G. On the Interaction between the Quantity and Quality of Children. // The Journal of Political Economy. 1973. 81. . 279288.
5. Blanchet D. , Ekert-Jaffe O., The Demographic Impact of Family Benefits : Evidence from a Micro-Model and from Macro-Data. Oxford.: Clerendon Press, 1994.
6. Cohen A., Dehejia R., Romanov D. Do Financial Incentives Affect Fertility http://www.nber. org/~rdehejia/papers/w13700.pdf
7. Coleman D. Reproduction and Survival in an Unknown World: What Drives Todays Industrial Populations and to What Future? // People and Place. 2000. 8. . 16.
8. DAddio A. C., dErcole M. M. Trends and Determinants of Fertility Rates in OECD Countries: The Role of Policies // OECD social, employment and migration working papers. 2006. 5.
9. Da-Rocha J.-M., Fuster L. Why are Fertility Rates and Female Employment Ratios Positively Correlated Across O.C.D.E. Cuntries? // International Economic Review. 2006. 47. . 1187 1222.
10. Gauthier A. and Hatzius J. Family Benefits and Fertility: An Econometrics Analysys // Population Studies. 1997. 51. . 295306.
11. Gerster M., Keiding N., Knudsen L.B. Education and second birth rates in Denmark 19811994 // Demographic Research. 2007. 17. . 181210.
12. Hoem J. M. Why does Sweden have such high fertility? // Demographic Research. 2005. 13. . 559572.
13. Kreyenfeld M., Zabe C. Female education and the second child: Great Britain and Western Germany compared // Zeitschrift fur Wirtschafts und Sozialwissenschaften/Schmollers Jahrbuch. 2005. 125. . 145156.
14. Macdonald P. The toolbox of public policies to impact on fertility A global view http://dspace.anu.edu.au/bitstream/1885/41446/2/sevilleMcD1.pdf
15. Van de Kaa D. Postmodern fertility preferences: from changing value orientation to new behaviour // Working Papers in Demography. 1997. N 74.

» pdf