Demography and social economy, 2019, 1(35):53-68
doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/dse2019.01.053
UDC 330.59(478)
JEL CLASSIFICATION: I32; I38

E.A. GRIGORAS
scientific researcher, PhD student
Centre for Demographic Researches
National Institute for Economic Research Republic of Moldova
MD-2064, Republic of Moldova, Chisinau, Ion Creanga, 45
E-mail: egrigoras88@gmail.com

PARTICULARITIES OF FERTILITY TRANSITION IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND SELECTED FORMER-SOVIET COUNTRIES
Section: DEMOGRAPHIC PROCESSES
Language: English
Abstract: The article provides the particularities of fertility transition in the Republic of Moldova and former Soviet Republics from European region (Russia, Belarus, Ukraine and the Baltic countries). The postponing fertility of younger women and the tendencies of recuperation of postponed fertility in the older group of women and the change in complete cohort fertility are examined. The aim of the research is to distinguish the main particularities of fertility transition in the Republic of Moldova and selected former Soviet countries during the period 1971–2014. The main objectives are the delimitation of divergences and convergences among them, the determination of fertility transition stages, the assessment of births postponement level, and the quantification of fertility recuperation level in cohorts that have completed their reproductive period. A postponement and recuperation model proposed by T. Frejka was used as the main method of analysis. The study is based on the Human Fertility Database (HFD) and the vital statistics for the Republic of Moldova. The period analysed is 1971–2014. The quantification of fertility postponement and recuperation was realised through the comparative analysis of the cumulated age-specific fertility of the 1960 cohort (the reference cohort) and the cumulated age-specific fertility of the 1975 and 1980 cohorts. The results show that after 1990, the postponement index is in continuing increase in all countries. The Baltic countries have the highest index of postponement while the Republic of Moldova the lowest. Russia, Belarus and Ukraine register the medium level of postponement index. A slower pace than in other countries characterizes the fertility transition in the Republic of Moldova. The fertility profile has an intermediate character, which moves from the early to the late model, recording the first and second phase The Baltic countries are characterized by a faster fertility transition and have been closer to the West European fertility model, especially Estonia, which reached the end of the fertility transition. The fertility transition in Russia, Belarus and Ukraine has been largely influenced by financial incentives for fertility, which are reflected in the pattern of the fertility transition and the shift through different phases.
Key words: fertility postponement, fertility recuperation, particularities of fertility transition, cumulative fertility rate, total fertility rate, cohort fertility rate.
References:
1. Billari, F.C. and H.-P. Kohler. (2004). Patterns of low and very low fertility in Europe. Population Studies. 58 (2), 161-176.
2. Brienna, P.H. (2008). Family Formation in Post-Soviet Ukraine: Changing Effects of Education in a Period of Rapid Social Change. Social Forces. Vol. 87, No. 2, December 2008, 767-794, University of North Carolina Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.0.0140
3. Brienna, Perelli-Harris. (2008). Ukraine: On the border between old and new in uncertain times. Demographic Research. Vol. 19, art. 29, 36 p. doi:https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.29
4. Elizarov, V., Levin, V. (2015). Russian Federation aging project family policies in Russia: could efforts to raise fertility rates slow population aging? World Bank Group, September 12, 37 p.
5. Frejka, T. (2010). Cohort overlays of evolving childbearing patterns: How postponement and recuperation are reflected in period fertility trends. Demographic Research, (revised, November 2010), 53 p.
6. Frejka, T. (2012). The role of contemporary childbearing postponement and recuperation in shaping period fertility trends. Comparative Population Studies. No. 36 (4), 927-957.
7. Frejka, T. and G. Calot. (2001). Cohort reproductive patterns in low fertility countries. Population and Development Review. No. 27 (1), 103-132. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2001.00103.x
8. Frejka, T. and G. Calot. (2001). Cohort childbearing age patterns in low-fertility countries in the late 20th century: Is the postponement of births an inherent element? MPIDR Working Paper WP 2001-009, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock.
9. Frejka, T., Zakharov, S. (2012). Comprehensive Analyses of Fertility Trends in the Russian Federation during the Past Half Century. Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, working paper, p.18.
10. Gagauz, O., Buciuceanu-Vrabie, M. (2011). Rolul parental și rolul profesional: oportunitati de echilibrare pentru femeia contemporana [Parental role and professional role: balancing opportunities for contemporary woman]. Chișinau: “Tipografia – Sirius” SRL, 136 p. [in Romanian].
11. Gagauz, O. (2018). Fertility in the republic of Moldova: European trends and national particularities [Рождаемость в Республике Молдова: европейские тенденции и национальная специфика]. Demographic review. No. 5(3), 57-80. doi:https://doi.org/10.17323/demreview.v5i3.8135 [in Russian].
12. Andersson, G., Lisbeth B. Knudsen et al. (2009). Cohort fertility patterns in the Nordic countries. Demographic research. Vol. 20, art. 14, 313-352. doi:https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2009.20.14
13. Jejeebhoy, S.J. (1995). Women’s Education, Autonomy and Reproductive Behaviour: Experiences from Developing Countries. United Kingdom: Clarendon Press.
14. Kohler, H.-P., F. C. Billari, and J. A. Ortega. (2002). The emergence of lowest-low fertility in Europe during the 1990s. Population and Development Review. No. 28 (4), 641-680. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2002.00641.x
15. Kucera, T., Kucerova, O., Opara, E. (2000). New demographic faces of Europe: the changing population dynamics in countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Berlin; Heidelberg; New York; Barcelona; Hong Kong; London; Milan; Paris; Singapore; Tokyo. 422 p.
16. Lesthaeghe, R. (2001). Postponement and recuperation: Recent fertility trends and forecasts in six Western European countries. Paper presented at the IUSSP Seminar “International perspectives on low fertility: Trends, theories and policies”, Tokyo, 21-23, March 2001.
17. Lesthaeghe, R. and J. Surkyn. (2002). New forms of household formation in Central and Eastern Europe: Are they related to newly emerging value orientations? Economic Survey of Europe 2002/1. Economic Commission for Europe, United Nations, New York and Geneva, pp. 197-216.
18. Lesthaeghe, R. and P. Willems. (1999). Is low fertility a temporary phenomenon in the European Union? Population and Development Review. 25 (2), 211-228. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.1999.00211.x
19. Bhrolcháin, Máire Ní and Laurent Toulemon. Does Postponement Explain the Trend to Later Childbearing in France? Vienna Yearbook of Population Research. 2005, pp. 83-107. doi:https://doi.org/10.1553/populationyearbook2005s83
20. Miller W.B., Pasta D.J. (1995). Behavioural Intentions: Which Ones Predict Fertility Behavior in Married Couples? Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 25 (6), 530-555. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1995.tb01766.x
21. Penina, O., Jdanov, D.A., Grigoriev, P. (2015). Producing reliable mortality estimates in the context of distorted population statistics: the case of Moldova. Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, working paper, 35 p.
22. Shakhotska, L., Bobrova, A. (2014). Impact of structural and socio-economic factors on the number of births and deaths in the Republic of Belarus. Demography and social economy, 2014, 2(22), 101-111. doi:https://doi.org/10.15407/dse2014.02.101 doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/dse2014.02.101
23. Sobotka, T. (2004). Postponement of Childbearing and Low Fertility in Europe. Dutch University Press: Amsterdam.
24. Sobotka, T. (2011). Fertility in Central and Eastern Europe after 1989: Collapse and Gradual Recovery. Historical Social Research. Vol. 36, No. 2 (136), 246-296.
25. Stankuniene, V., Jasilioniene, A. (2008). Lithuania: Fertility decline and its determinants. Demographic research. Vol. 19, art. 20, 705-742.doi:https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.20
26. Van de Kaa, D. J. 2001. Postmodern fertility preferences: From changing value orientation to new behavior. Global Fertility Transition, R.A. Bulatao and J.B. Casterline (eds.). Supplement to Population and Development Review. Vol. 27, 290-331.
27. Zakharov, S. (2008). Russian Federation: From the first to second demographic transition. Demographic research. Vol. 19, art. 24, 907-972. doi:https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.24

» pdf